<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 538 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108115</link>
    <description>Penalty on a transporter cannot be sustained on a mere presumption that he knew the goods were contraband; such knowledge must be proved by evidence in quasi-judicial proceedings. Where the Revenue relies only on probability and places no material on record to establish awareness of the offending nature of the goods, penalty is not justified and the order setting it aside stands upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 538 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108115</link>
      <description>Penalty on a transporter cannot be sustained on a mere presumption that he knew the goods were contraband; such knowledge must be proved by evidence in quasi-judicial proceedings. Where the Revenue relies only on probability and places no material on record to establish awareness of the offending nature of the goods, penalty is not justified and the order setting it aside stands upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>