<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 530 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for the appellant to prove that loading work was done by regular salaried staff, not hired laborers. The appellant was granted an opportunity to produce evidence and a personal hearing. The appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 530 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for the appellant to prove that loading work was done by regular salaried staff, not hired laborers. The appellant was granted an opportunity to produce evidence and a personal hearing. The appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>