https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108107 Where a specific statutory remedy is available before the Magistrate for recall of a non-bailable warrant, the High Court should not ordinarily exercise its inherent jurisdiction to grant that relief. Questions about service of summons, awareness of the warrant, and willingness to appear were held to be matters for the trial court under the criminal procedure law. The Court also declined to examine disputed allegations of conspiracy, diversion of corporate funds, or piercing the corporate veil at the warrant stage, leaving those issues to investigation and trial. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy without prejudice to the defence. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:54:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108107 Where a specific statutory remedy is available before the Magistrate for recall of a non-bailable warrant, the High Court should not ordinarily exercise its inherent jurisdiction to grant that relief. Questions about service of summons, awareness of the warrant, and willingness to appear were held to be matters for the trial court under the criminal procedure law. The Court also declined to examine disputed allegations of conspiracy, diversion of corporate funds, or piercing the corporate veil at the warrant stage, leaving those issues to investigation and trial. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy without prejudice to the defence. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108107