<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 656 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108091</link>
    <description>Valuation of physician&#039;s samples under the excise valuation rules was examined in the context of waiver of pre-deposit. Because the appellant had repeatedly filed declarations showing cost-construction plus profit valuation, supported by Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificates, a prima facie case was found for the period up to July 1999 and the demand for that period was treated as prima facie time-barred. For the later period from July 1999 to May 2000, no prima facie case for complete waiver was made out. Partial waiver was therefore granted, subject to a deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs, with the balance duty and penalties stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 656 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108091</link>
      <description>Valuation of physician&#039;s samples under the excise valuation rules was examined in the context of waiver of pre-deposit. Because the appellant had repeatedly filed declarations showing cost-construction plus profit valuation, supported by Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificates, a prima facie case was found for the period up to July 1999 and the demand for that period was treated as prima facie time-barred. For the later period from July 1999 to May 2000, no prima facie case for complete waiver was made out. Partial waiver was therefore granted, subject to a deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs, with the balance duty and penalties stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>