<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108079</link>
    <description>Conflicting CESTAT views arose on whether sub-assemblies and assemblies of photocopiers are covered by Item No. 9009909010 in Chapter 90 of the Import Export Policy, 1999, and on the proper meaning of &quot;components&quot; and &quot;parts&quot; for that policy. Because the Tribunal had taken divergent positions on the classification question, the issue was referred for consideration by a Larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:25:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108079</link>
      <description>Conflicting CESTAT views arose on whether sub-assemblies and assemblies of photocopiers are covered by Item No. 9009909010 in Chapter 90 of the Import Export Policy, 1999, and on the proper meaning of &quot;components&quot; and &quot;parts&quot; for that policy. Because the Tribunal had taken divergent positions on the classification question, the issue was referred for consideration by a Larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>