<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 358 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108070</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai granted a stay on the recovery of interest, fine, and penalty imposed under Rule 49A(1)(b) as the duty was paid, and the appellants did not have permission under Rule 49A. The pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F were waived, and the recovery was stayed pending the final hearing of the case with appeal Nos. E/4024 and E/4025.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 358 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108070</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai granted a stay on the recovery of interest, fine, and penalty imposed under Rule 49A(1)(b) as the duty was paid, and the appellants did not have permission under Rule 49A. The pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F were waived, and the recovery was stayed pending the final hearing of the case with appeal Nos. E/4024 and E/4025.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>