https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108061 The court found in favor of the petitioners in the dispute over payment for excess bottles supplied, ruling that the respondents were liable for the unpaid consignment beyond the contracted quantity. The issuance of 'C' Forms and the assurances of payment upon utilization were deemed to establish the payment obligation. The court concluded that the petitioners had sufficiently demonstrated their case for admission of the winding up petition based on the assessment of liability, leading to the admission of the petition without the need for a trial. en-us Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:41:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108061 The court found in favor of the petitioners in the dispute over payment for excess bottles supplied, ruling that the respondents were liable for the unpaid consignment beyond the contracted quantity. The issuance of 'C' Forms and the assurances of payment upon utilization were deemed to establish the payment obligation. The court concluded that the petitioners had sufficiently demonstrated their case for admission of the winding up petition based on the assessment of liability, leading to the admission of the petition without the need for a trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108061