<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 613 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108058</link>
    <description>In winding-up jurisdiction, a petition based on unpaid contractual dues was treated as timely where the claim arose from bills for work done and consultancy services, supported by the company&#039;s own record of last payment and tax deduction. The company&#039;s denial of liability failed because it was not backed by the contract, correspondence, accounts, or any material showing a lawful basis for liquidated damages or overpayment adjustments, and an adverse inference followed from the absence of supporting books. With a prima facie debt established, no bona fide defence shown, and non-payment persisting after notice, the company was treated as unable to pay its debts and the petition was admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 613 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108058</link>
      <description>In winding-up jurisdiction, a petition based on unpaid contractual dues was treated as timely where the claim arose from bills for work done and consultancy services, supported by the company&#039;s own record of last payment and tax deduction. The company&#039;s denial of liability failed because it was not backed by the contract, correspondence, accounts, or any material showing a lawful basis for liquidated damages or overpayment adjustments, and an adverse inference followed from the absence of supporting books. With a prima facie debt established, no bona fide defence shown, and non-payment persisting after notice, the company was treated as unable to pay its debts and the petition was admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>