<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108052</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellant, exempting the pre-deposit condition and staying duty collection. The Tribunal scheduled a regular hearing for December 4, 2003, after the appellant successfully argued that the declared price would only apply from the date of declaration and the Revenue failed to demonstrate sales at a higher rate post-declaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108052</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellant, exempting the pre-deposit condition and staying duty collection. The Tribunal scheduled a regular hearing for December 4, 2003, after the appellant successfully argued that the declared price would only apply from the date of declaration and the Revenue failed to demonstrate sales at a higher rate post-declaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>