https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108046 The court dismissed the petition for winding up the company due to procedural deficiencies in serving the statutory notice at the registered office, as required by law. Additionally, the court found that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the disappearance of the substratum of the company, leading to the rejection of the petition on this ground as well. The court did not address the company's defense regarding the repayment of the loan, ultimately concluding that the petition lacked merit on both counts and dismissing it without costs or granting any interim relief. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:01:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108046 The court dismissed the petition for winding up the company due to procedural deficiencies in serving the statutory notice at the registered office, as required by law. Additionally, the court found that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding the disappearance of the substratum of the company, leading to the rejection of the petition on this ground as well. The court did not address the company's defense regarding the repayment of the loan, ultimately concluding that the petition lacked merit on both counts and dismissing it without costs or granting any interim relief. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108046