https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108045 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for restoration of an appeal that was previously dismissed due to delay in filing. The delay was deemed unjustified as the impugned order was received two years after the passing date. The appellant's advocate failed to provide valid reasons for the delay, and the Tribunal noted the advocate's ineffective conduct during proceedings. Despite the advocate's arguments for restoration, the Tribunal found no grounds to recall the earlier order and rejected the application for restoration of the appeal. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:58:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108045 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for restoration of an appeal that was previously dismissed due to delay in filing. The delay was deemed unjustified as the impugned order was received two years after the passing date. The appellant's advocate failed to provide valid reasons for the delay, and the Tribunal noted the advocate's ineffective conduct during proceedings. Despite the advocate's arguments for restoration, the Tribunal found no grounds to recall the earlier order and rejected the application for restoration of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108045