<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108042</link>
    <description>The duty demand on laminated paper with aluminum foil was confirmed under Chapter Heading 39.20 instead of CETA sub-heading 3607.60. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit based on a previous order classifying the product differently for the same assessee, allowing the appeal to proceed without depositing the duty amount. The classification issue and the circular clarifying the classification under Chapter 39 were to be examined further during the appeal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108042</link>
      <description>The duty demand on laminated paper with aluminum foil was confirmed under Chapter Heading 39.20 instead of CETA sub-heading 3607.60. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit based on a previous order classifying the product differently for the same assessee, allowing the appeal to proceed without depositing the duty amount. The classification issue and the circular clarifying the classification under Chapter 39 were to be examined further during the appeal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>