https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108040 The court dismissed the writ appeals, affirming the third respondent club's right to enforce the suspension orders against the appellants. It held that Circular No. 32 of 1975 was not enforceable as it lacked statutory force, and Article 28 of the third respondent's Articles of Association was valid. The court ruled that a writ of mandamus could not be used to enforce administrative instructions and that the internal discipline of a private club did not involve public law aspects or statutory violations. Consequently, the appellants' requests for a writ of mandamus were deemed not maintainable. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:48:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108040 The court dismissed the writ appeals, affirming the third respondent club's right to enforce the suspension orders against the appellants. It held that Circular No. 32 of 1975 was not enforceable as it lacked statutory force, and Article 28 of the third respondent's Articles of Association was valid. The court ruled that a writ of mandamus could not be used to enforce administrative instructions and that the internal discipline of a private club did not involve public law aspects or statutory violations. Consequently, the appellants' requests for a writ of mandamus were deemed not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108040