<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 511 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification order issued under Sec. 37B as prospective, effective from the specified date in the order, for sacks made of HDPE woven fabrics coated with LDPE under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of clear language and specified dates in classification orders for excise duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 511 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification order issued under Sec. 37B as prospective, effective from the specified date in the order, for sacks made of HDPE woven fabrics coated with LDPE under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of clear language and specified dates in classification orders for excise duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>