https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108020 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, rejected miscellaneous applications seeking extension of stay orders based on the interpretation of Section 35F. The Tribunal affirmed its power to waive pre-deposit and stay recovery, emphasizing that this power remains unless amended. Despite the rejection, the waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F was upheld, and the Tribunal directed priority for the regular hearing of connected appeals. The Tribunal's decision maintained the waiver of pre-deposit while denying the extension of stay orders, in line with its ruling in a previous case involving M/s. Themis Pharmaceuticals and Others. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:04:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108020 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, rejected miscellaneous applications seeking extension of stay orders based on the interpretation of Section 35F. The Tribunal affirmed its power to waive pre-deposit and stay recovery, emphasizing that this power remains unless amended. Despite the rejection, the waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F was upheld, and the Tribunal directed priority for the regular hearing of connected appeals. The Tribunal's decision maintained the waiver of pre-deposit while denying the extension of stay orders, in line with its ruling in a previous case involving M/s. Themis Pharmaceuticals and Others. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108020