<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 502 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty of Rs. 1,000/- each imposed on the appellants for violating the conditional permission to store molasses in kutcha pits without paying Central Excise duty. The appellants were not allowed to remove the molasses to kutcha pits without fulfilling the duty payment condition, emphasizing compliance with excise regulations to protect revenue. The Tribunal differentiated the present case from previous decisions, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s authority to impose conditions on storage to safeguard revenue. The appeals were rejected, maintaining the duty demand and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 502 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalty of Rs. 1,000/- each imposed on the appellants for violating the conditional permission to store molasses in kutcha pits without paying Central Excise duty. The appellants were not allowed to remove the molasses to kutcha pits without fulfilling the duty payment condition, emphasizing compliance with excise regulations to protect revenue. The Tribunal differentiated the present case from previous decisions, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s authority to impose conditions on storage to safeguard revenue. The appeals were rejected, maintaining the duty demand and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>