<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 497 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108010</link>
    <description>Modvat credit reversed to comply with a customs exemption condition under Notification No. 203/92-Cus. could not be refunded under excise law, because refund would create an impermissible double benefit after the appellants had already taken duty exemption on export inputs. The reversal itself satisfied the notification condition, so the refund claim was not admissible. Once the credit was reversed, no further customs demand was warranted for alleged breach of clause v(a) on the facts recorded, as the demand had either been dropped or never raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 497 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108010</link>
      <description>Modvat credit reversed to comply with a customs exemption condition under Notification No. 203/92-Cus. could not be refunded under excise law, because refund would create an impermissible double benefit after the appellants had already taken duty exemption on export inputs. The reversal itself satisfied the notification condition, so the refund claim was not admissible. Once the credit was reversed, no further customs demand was warranted for alleged breach of clause v(a) on the facts recorded, as the demand had either been dropped or never raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>