<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 490 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108002</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the declaration under Rule 57G(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was condoned in accordance with CBEC Circular No. 267/69/95-CX.8 dated 23-6-95, which dealt with delayed declarations. A delay of about 16 days was accepted because the authority followed the Board&#039;s instructions, and the proforma credit was permitted to be treated as Modvat credit. The operative effect was that the assessee obtained the benefit of Modvat credit despite the delayed declaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:56:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 490 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108002</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the declaration under Rule 57G(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was condoned in accordance with CBEC Circular No. 267/69/95-CX.8 dated 23-6-95, which dealt with delayed declarations. A delay of about 16 days was accepted because the authority followed the Board&#039;s instructions, and the proforma credit was permitted to be treated as Modvat credit. The operative effect was that the assessee obtained the benefit of Modvat credit despite the delayed declaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>