<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 484 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and confirmed the requirement for the appellants to pay appropriate interest on the delayed payment in PLA. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of rectifying errors promptly to avoid penal consequences, citing relevant case law that supports the non-leviability of penalties if errors are rectified before the issuance of a show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:36:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 484 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and confirmed the requirement for the appellants to pay appropriate interest on the delayed payment in PLA. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of rectifying errors promptly to avoid penal consequences, citing relevant case law that supports the non-leviability of penalties if errors are rectified before the issuance of a show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>