<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 481 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107993</link>
    <description>Classification of the returned C4 Raffinate stream under Heading 2711.12 or 2711.19 depended on the classification status of the incoming stream, which was under reconsideration. The Tribunal therefore declined to finally determine the classification or limitation issues on the existing record and directed that the matter be remitted for fresh adjudication. After the incoming stream is finally classified, the original authority must re-hear the dispute and make any necessary duty or credit adjustment accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 481 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107993</link>
      <description>Classification of the returned C4 Raffinate stream under Heading 2711.12 or 2711.19 depended on the classification status of the incoming stream, which was under reconsideration. The Tribunal therefore declined to finally determine the classification or limitation issues on the existing record and directed that the matter be remitted for fresh adjudication. After the incoming stream is finally classified, the original authority must re-hear the dispute and make any necessary duty or credit adjustment accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>