<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 476 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to issue show cause notices, confirmed the involvement of the Customs House Agent (CHA) and its Director in fraudulent activities, and validated penalties imposed by the Commissioner. However, the penalties were reduced by 50% due to the CHA&#039;s secondary role compared to the main perpetrators.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 476 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to issue show cause notices, confirmed the involvement of the Customs House Agent (CHA) and its Director in fraudulent activities, and validated penalties imposed by the Commissioner. However, the penalties were reduced by 50% due to the CHA&#039;s secondary role compared to the main perpetrators.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>