<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 467 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107978</link>
    <description>Fraudulent availment of credit on the strength of a forged TR-6 challan, followed by use of that wrongful credit for duty payment on clearances, was treated as deliberate fraud and forgery. The appellate authority held that these facts attracted penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and found no basis to interfere with the penalty. Relief from penalty was refused and the appeal was dismissed, with the penalty sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 467 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107978</link>
      <description>Fraudulent availment of credit on the strength of a forged TR-6 challan, followed by use of that wrongful credit for duty payment on clearances, was treated as deliberate fraud and forgery. The appellate authority held that these facts attracted penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and found no basis to interfere with the penalty. Relief from penalty was refused and the appeal was dismissed, with the penalty sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>