<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 780 - UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107976</link>
    <description>National Savings Certificates issued by postal authorities in a firm&#039;s name despite a statutory prohibition were not treated as void to defeat payment, because the irregularity arose from the department&#039;s own officers. The complainant remained entitled to the full maturity value. The wrongful issuance and subsequent withholding of payment also constituted deficiency in service, and the postal department was directed to pay interest at the Saving Bank Account rate from the date of maturity until actual payment. The complainant&#039;s relief was maintained, with post-maturity interest added.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 780 - UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107976</link>
      <description>National Savings Certificates issued by postal authorities in a firm&#039;s name despite a statutory prohibition were not treated as void to defeat payment, because the irregularity arose from the department&#039;s own officers. The complainant remained entitled to the full maturity value. The wrongful issuance and subsequent withholding of payment also constituted deficiency in service, and the postal department was directed to pay interest at the Saving Bank Account rate from the date of maturity until actual payment. The complainant&#039;s relief was maintained, with post-maturity interest added.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>