<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 464 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107975</link>
    <description>Remission of duty on destroyed excisable goods was sustained where the cigarettes were admittedly damaged, destroyed under Central Excise supervision, and no negligence by the assessee was shown. The exact cause of contamination or damage was treated as immaterial because the Revenue produced no material to establish fault, and the earlier remission order had not been challenged. On that basis, duty remission was rightly allowed and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 464 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107975</link>
      <description>Remission of duty on destroyed excisable goods was sustained where the cigarettes were admittedly damaged, destroyed under Central Excise supervision, and no negligence by the assessee was shown. The exact cause of contamination or damage was treated as immaterial because the Revenue produced no material to establish fault, and the earlier remission order had not been challenged. On that basis, duty remission was rightly allowed and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>