https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107974 Pre-execution judicial review of a preventive detention order under COFEPOSA is confined to narrow exceptions, including lack of authority, wrong person or purpose, vague or irrelevant grounds, mala fides, or a limited form of non-application of mind. A writ petition under Article 226 challenging detention at that stage cannot ordinarily be entertained on merits where the grounds of detention have not yet been served. Complaints based on delay in execution, alleged payment of duty, surrender of licences, or asserted absence of material were held premature and outside the recognised exceptions. The detention challenge was therefore misconceived, and the detainee was required to surrender before pursuing grievances after service of the grounds of detention. en-us Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:52:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107974 Pre-execution judicial review of a preventive detention order under COFEPOSA is confined to narrow exceptions, including lack of authority, wrong person or purpose, vague or irrelevant grounds, mala fides, or a limited form of non-application of mind. A writ petition under Article 226 challenging detention at that stage cannot ordinarily be entertained on merits where the grounds of detention have not yet been served. Complaints based on delay in execution, alleged payment of duty, surrender of licences, or asserted absence of material were held premature and outside the recognised exceptions. The detention challenge was therefore misconceived, and the detainee was required to surrender before pursuing grievances after service of the grounds of detention. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107974