<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 463 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the denial of Modvat credit due to the dealer&#039;s unregistered status. It was established that the dealer in question had been taken over by a registered entity before the relevant period, allowing for the legitimate claiming of Modvat credit. As the successor entity was a registered dealer, the denial of credit based on the initial dealer&#039;s registration status was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the appellants&#039; appeal was allowed, and the previous order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:29:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 463 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the denial of Modvat credit due to the dealer&#039;s unregistered status. It was established that the dealer in question had been taken over by a registered entity before the relevant period, allowing for the legitimate claiming of Modvat credit. As the successor entity was a registered dealer, the denial of credit based on the initial dealer&#039;s registration status was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the appellants&#039; appeal was allowed, and the previous order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>