<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 903 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107963</link>
    <description>The appellate order quantified the payable amount as inclusive of all interest, and that figure was treated as the final liability after accounting for admitted dues, payments already made, and interest. Because the order did not provide for any further interest on default, the omission was treated as a refusal of additional interest. The earlier trial court direction merged into the appellate order, so no separate or supplementary interest could be claimed by relying on the earlier order or by expanding the default clause. The payable amount remained confined to the sum fixed by the appellate court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 903 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107963</link>
      <description>The appellate order quantified the payable amount as inclusive of all interest, and that figure was treated as the final liability after accounting for admitted dues, payments already made, and interest. Because the order did not provide for any further interest on default, the omission was treated as a refusal of additional interest. The earlier trial court direction merged into the appellate order, so no separate or supplementary interest could be claimed by relying on the earlier order or by expanding the default clause. The payable amount remained confined to the sum fixed by the appellate court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>