https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107948 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, directing the respondent to refund the excess duty paid under protest within 10 weeks. The appellant's compliance with the protest requirement and lack of evidence contradicting the protest payment claim led the Tribunal to accept the argument that the refund should not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, in line with the Supreme Court decision in Sinkhai Synthetics and Chemicals v. CCE. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:53:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107948 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, directing the respondent to refund the excess duty paid under protest within 10 weeks. The appellant's compliance with the protest requirement and lack of evidence contradicting the protest payment claim led the Tribunal to accept the argument that the refund should not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, in line with the Supreme Court decision in Sinkhai Synthetics and Chemicals v. CCE. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107948