<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 438 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the Revenue&#039;s objection that invoices for clearance of colour picture tubes could not be treated as documents covering picture tubes fitted with deflection yoke. On that basis, it declined full waiver of the duty and penalty pre-deposit at the interim stage. It nevertheless granted partial relief by directing a limited pre-deposit and waiving the balance, with stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 438 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the Revenue&#039;s objection that invoices for clearance of colour picture tubes could not be treated as documents covering picture tubes fitted with deflection yoke. On that basis, it declined full waiver of the duty and penalty pre-deposit at the interim stage. It nevertheless granted partial relief by directing a limited pre-deposit and waiving the balance, with stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>