<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 345 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 4,24,263 against the appellant, rejecting the additional 10% value on physician&#039;s samples. It ruled that physician&#039;s samples should be valued based on the price of commercially sold medicines, emphasizing that duty should be paid on the normal market value of goods, irrespective of whether they are sold or distributed for free. The decision clarified the assessment of duty on physician&#039;s samples, emphasizing the need to assess goods for duty based on their market value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:51:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 345 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs. 4,24,263 against the appellant, rejecting the additional 10% value on physician&#039;s samples. It ruled that physician&#039;s samples should be valued based on the price of commercially sold medicines, emphasizing that duty should be paid on the normal market value of goods, irrespective of whether they are sold or distributed for free. The decision clarified the assessment of duty on physician&#039;s samples, emphasizing the need to assess goods for duty based on their market value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>