<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 344 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107915</link>
    <description>Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 188/93-Cus. was available for goods imported for use in an integrated aqua culture farm where the import supported the farm&#039;s operational requirements and export production. The term &quot;integrated aqua culture farm&quot; was not defined in the notification, and the technical material did not require every unit to include all components such as a farm, hatchery, feed mill and processing facility in each case. On the available literature and facts, the Commissioner accepted the importer&#039;s claim, and the Department failed to produce evidence to rebut that finding or justify denial of the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 344 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107915</link>
      <description>Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 188/93-Cus. was available for goods imported for use in an integrated aqua culture farm where the import supported the farm&#039;s operational requirements and export production. The term &quot;integrated aqua culture farm&quot; was not defined in the notification, and the technical material did not require every unit to include all components such as a farm, hatchery, feed mill and processing facility in each case. On the available literature and facts, the Commissioner accepted the importer&#039;s claim, and the Department failed to produce evidence to rebut that finding or justify denial of the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>