<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 340 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107911</link>
    <description>Suspension of a customs house agent&#039;s licence under Regulation 21(2) may be ordered without a prior show cause notice or personal hearing, because the procedure in Regulation 23 does not apply; however, the Commissioner must then grant a post-decisional hearing and pass a speaking order, failing which the suspension revokes automatically. Suspension of one establishment cannot be justified merely because another branch has been suspended, unless there are independent allegations or material showing violation by the concerned establishment itself. The port-area establishment&#039;s suspension was therefore set aside, while the power to proceed after a post-decisional hearing was preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:37:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 340 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107911</link>
      <description>Suspension of a customs house agent&#039;s licence under Regulation 21(2) may be ordered without a prior show cause notice or personal hearing, because the procedure in Regulation 23 does not apply; however, the Commissioner must then grant a post-decisional hearing and pass a speaking order, failing which the suspension revokes automatically. Suspension of one establishment cannot be justified merely because another branch has been suspended, unless there are independent allegations or material showing violation by the concerned establishment itself. The port-area establishment&#039;s suspension was therefore set aside, while the power to proceed after a post-decisional hearing was preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>