https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107908 CESTAT, Mumbai declined to modify the earlier stay order, but extended the time for compliance with the deposit direction by one month. The appeal remained pending for later consideration, with dismissal contemplated if compliance was not reported. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107908 CESTAT, Mumbai declined to modify the earlier stay order, but extended the time for compliance with the deposit direction by one month. The appeal remained pending for later consideration, with dismissal contemplated if compliance was not reported. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107908