<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 334 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107905</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the redemption fine and penalty reduction while reinstating the classification under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 4407.29. The Tribunal emphasized the correctness of the classification and the need to rectify past misclassifications, maintaining that the importer&#039;s agreement related only to the value loading, not the classification change.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 334 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107905</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the redemption fine and penalty reduction while reinstating the classification under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 4407.29. The Tribunal emphasized the correctness of the classification and the need to rectify past misclassifications, maintaining that the importer&#039;s agreement related only to the value loading, not the classification change.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>