<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 315 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act due to unauthorized imports. The Tribunal found the redemption fines and penalties imposed to be within statutory limits and reasonable, despite inconsistencies. The appellants&#039; challenges regarding market enquiry for redemption fines were dismissed as they waived their right to a show-cause notice. The Tribunal reduced the quantum of redemption fines and penalties in specific cases but ultimately rejected the appeals on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 315 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act due to unauthorized imports. The Tribunal found the redemption fines and penalties imposed to be within statutory limits and reasonable, despite inconsistencies. The appellants&#039; challenges regarding market enquiry for redemption fines were dismissed as they waived their right to a show-cause notice. The Tribunal reduced the quantum of redemption fines and penalties in specific cases but ultimately rejected the appeals on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>