<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 322 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107857</link>
    <description>A demand based solely on delayed RG-1 entry could not be sustained where the records showed the goods were entered after testing or buyer clearance and the private and statutory records were examined together. The factual finding that the goods in the private records matched those in the statutory records remained unrebutted, and no contrary evidence was produced to displace the conclusion that duty-paid clearance had been recorded. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:42:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 322 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107857</link>
      <description>A demand based solely on delayed RG-1 entry could not be sustained where the records showed the goods were entered after testing or buyer clearance and the private and statutory records were examined together. The factual finding that the goods in the private records matched those in the statutory records remained unrebutted, and no contrary evidence was produced to displace the conclusion that duty-paid clearance had been recorded. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>