<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1087 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107851</link>
    <description>The importer contested the Department&#039;s attempt to increase the assessable value of imported marble blocks, arguing against the proposed raise from US $95 to US $300 per metric ton. The Commissioner imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 88 lakhs and a penalty of Rs. 8.30 lakhs, based on market inquiries and past decisions. The Tribunal scrutinized the Commissioner&#039;s calculation methods, directing the importer to deposit Rs. 14 lakhs for fines and penalties. Clearance of goods was allowed upon deposit, with future fines covered by a bond, considering the importer&#039;s compliance history. An expedited hearing was granted after the deposit was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:53:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1087 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107851</link>
      <description>The importer contested the Department&#039;s attempt to increase the assessable value of imported marble blocks, arguing against the proposed raise from US $95 to US $300 per metric ton. The Commissioner imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 88 lakhs and a penalty of Rs. 8.30 lakhs, based on market inquiries and past decisions. The Tribunal scrutinized the Commissioner&#039;s calculation methods, directing the importer to deposit Rs. 14 lakhs for fines and penalties. Clearance of goods was allowed upon deposit, with future fines covered by a bond, considering the importer&#039;s compliance history. An expedited hearing was granted after the deposit was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>