<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 505 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of printing frames under Chapter Heading 84.42, affirmed the applicability of the Notification exempting duty on such frames, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to change its characterization of the goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in the Revenue&#039;s approach and referenced a previous case for clarity on the classification of printing frames.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:22:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 505 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of printing frames under Chapter Heading 84.42, affirmed the applicability of the Notification exempting duty on such frames, and rejected the Revenue&#039;s attempt to change its characterization of the goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in the Revenue&#039;s approach and referenced a previous case for clarity on the classification of printing frames.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>