<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 460 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107837</link>
    <description>The appellants were treated as the real manufacturers of sterile surgical catguts because they bought the raw material, carried out processing, packed the goods, sent them for sterilisation, and marketed them under their own name; duty liability was therefore sustained. The extended period of limitation was upheld because the declaration was undated and there was no complete disclosure when the exemption limit was crossed, depriving the department of timely action. On exports, the record contained shipping bills and related particulars, and the matter was remanded for verification of the export quantity and consequential penalty after allowing production of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 460 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107837</link>
      <description>The appellants were treated as the real manufacturers of sterile surgical catguts because they bought the raw material, carried out processing, packed the goods, sent them for sterilisation, and marketed them under their own name; duty liability was therefore sustained. The extended period of limitation was upheld because the declaration was undated and there was no complete disclosure when the exemption limit was crossed, depriving the department of timely action. On exports, the record contained shipping bills and related particulars, and the matter was remanded for verification of the export quantity and consequential penalty after allowing production of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>