https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107808 A cross-objection under the Central Excise appellate scheme cannot replace a statutory appeal against the entire order of the Commissioner (Appeals); it operates only as a counter to the limited challenge raised in the departmental appeal, and was rejected to that extent. On redemption fine, appellate interference was justified only to the extent found disproportionate to the limited reduction in duty demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore sustained on the broader reliefs, but the redemption fine was enhanced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:16:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107808 A cross-objection under the Central Excise appellate scheme cannot replace a statutory appeal against the entire order of the Commissioner (Appeals); it operates only as a counter to the limited challenge raised in the departmental appeal, and was rejected to that extent. On redemption fine, appellate interference was justified only to the extent found disproportionate to the limited reduction in duty demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore sustained on the broader reliefs, but the redemption fine was enhanced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107808