https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107775 A Revenue miscellaneous application seeking to block consideration of a respondent's implementation request and to stay an earlier Tribunal order was rejected. The Tribunal noted that the earlier appeal had been allowed after dispensing with pre-deposit of penalty, and no amount had actually been deposited by the respondent, so there was no implementation application requiring restraint. The request to stay the operation of the earlier order was also unjustified because it would deprive the respondent of the benefit of the appeal merely due to the Department's pending reference application before the High Court, when no High Court ruling on the legal question was yet available. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:24:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107775 A Revenue miscellaneous application seeking to block consideration of a respondent's implementation request and to stay an earlier Tribunal order was rejected. The Tribunal noted that the earlier appeal had been allowed after dispensing with pre-deposit of penalty, and no amount had actually been deposited by the respondent, so there was no implementation application requiring restraint. The request to stay the operation of the earlier order was also unjustified because it would deprive the respondent of the benefit of the appeal merely due to the Department's pending reference application before the High Court, when no High Court ruling on the legal question was yet available. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107775