<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 433 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107765</link>
    <description>A jurisdictional objection to a notice under section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act can be raised at the stay stage because competence of the issuing authority goes to the root of the proceedings. The plea is not confined to an earlier stage and may be taken while the matter is pending. On that basis, the tribunal treated the objection as having merit for interim relief and granted unconditional stay, waiving pre-deposit and recovery during the stay proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 433 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107765</link>
      <description>A jurisdictional objection to a notice under section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act can be raised at the stay stage because competence of the issuing authority goes to the root of the proceedings. The plea is not confined to an earlier stage and may be taken while the matter is pending. On that basis, the tribunal treated the objection as having merit for interim relief and granted unconditional stay, waiving pre-deposit and recovery during the stay proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>