<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107744</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent-company, an Association for Economic Affairs of the Ministry for Economic Affairs and Trade of the Russian Federation. The Tribunal found that the respondent had a reasonable cause for the failure to pay service tax, as they believed the tax liability was on Rourkela Steel Plant and acted promptly upon becoming aware of the obligation. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed for technical breaches or bona fide beliefs, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 412 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107744</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent-company, an Association for Economic Affairs of the Ministry for Economic Affairs and Trade of the Russian Federation. The Tribunal found that the respondent had a reasonable cause for the failure to pay service tax, as they believed the tax liability was on Rourkela Steel Plant and acted promptly upon becoming aware of the obligation. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed for technical breaches or bona fide beliefs, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>