https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107742 An appeal directed only against a recovery notice was held not maintainable where the notice expressly referred to the underlying adjudication order confirming the demand, because the challenge was not brought against the proper order. The appeal was also held time barred, as the adjudication order dated 30-6-2000 was challenged only on 14-2-2002 and no basis was shown to overcome the delay. The impugned order was therefore sustained, and the challenge failed on both maintainability and limitation. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107742 An appeal directed only against a recovery notice was held not maintainable where the notice expressly referred to the underlying adjudication order confirming the demand, because the challenge was not brought against the proper order. The appeal was also held time barred, as the adjudication order dated 30-6-2000 was challenged only on 14-2-2002 and no basis was shown to overcome the delay. The impugned order was therefore sustained, and the challenge failed on both maintainability and limitation. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107742