<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 303 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107731</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the proper classification of imported fabric under Customs Tariff Heading 5515.91 or 5406.61. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate the fabric and impose a personal penalty was set aside. The appellant&#039;s argument that they cooperated with testing and did not mislead in classification was accepted. The tribunal referenced a previous decision to support overturning the penalties and confiscation. The judgment also addressed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim clearance under DFRC, directing a reevaluation by Customs Authorities with the appellant&#039;s input.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 303 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107731</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the proper classification of imported fabric under Customs Tariff Heading 5515.91 or 5406.61. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate the fabric and impose a personal penalty was set aside. The appellant&#039;s argument that they cooperated with testing and did not mislead in classification was accepted. The tribunal referenced a previous decision to support overturning the penalties and confiscation. The judgment also addressed the appellant&#039;s entitlement to claim clearance under DFRC, directing a reevaluation by Customs Authorities with the appellant&#039;s input.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>