<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 299 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107727</link>
    <description>Profit was not required to be separately added to labour charges received by a job worker for valuation of moulds and dies manufactured on job work basis. The Tribunal held that such job-work charges ordinarily contain an element of profit, because the work could not reasonably be performed without it being embedded in the receipts. It distinguished the departmental circular as relating to captively consumed goods, not job-work clearances, and followed earlier decisions taking the same view. On that basis, the Commissioner&#039;s valuation addition was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 299 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107727</link>
      <description>Profit was not required to be separately added to labour charges received by a job worker for valuation of moulds and dies manufactured on job work basis. The Tribunal held that such job-work charges ordinarily contain an element of profit, because the work could not reasonably be performed without it being embedded in the receipts. It distinguished the departmental circular as relating to captively consumed goods, not job-work clearances, and followed earlier decisions taking the same view. On that basis, the Commissioner&#039;s valuation addition was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>