<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 327 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107711</link>
    <description>Semi-finished plywood that still required side trimming, sanding and hand finishing was treated as not yet finished excisable goods, so the seized excess stock was not liable to confiscation. The alleged clandestine removal also failed on the evidence, as 41 pieces were covered by the excise gate pass and 4 pieces were issued as samples. As a result, the duty demand was set aside and the consequential penalty was also unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 327 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107711</link>
      <description>Semi-finished plywood that still required side trimming, sanding and hand finishing was treated as not yet finished excisable goods, so the seized excess stock was not liable to confiscation. The alleged clandestine removal also failed on the evidence, as 41 pieces were covered by the excise gate pass and 4 pieces were issued as samples. As a result, the duty demand was set aside and the consequential penalty was also unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>