<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 504 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107695</link>
    <description>Duty-free re-importation was conditional on re-export within the stipulated or extended period, and where that condition was not met in time, the duty-free facility ceased and the customs duty liability under the bond and bank guarantee became enforceable. The demand for customs duty and invocation of the bank guarantee were upheld. Subsequent re-export of the goods was relevant only to whether drawback could be considered on the duty already recovered, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for examination of that claim. The duty demand on re-import remained affirmed, subject to consideration of drawback arising from the later re-export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 504 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107695</link>
      <description>Duty-free re-importation was conditional on re-export within the stipulated or extended period, and where that condition was not met in time, the duty-free facility ceased and the customs duty liability under the bond and bank guarantee became enforceable. The demand for customs duty and invocation of the bank guarantee were upheld. Subsequent re-export of the goods was relevant only to whether drawback could be considered on the duty already recovered, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for examination of that claim. The duty demand on re-import remained affirmed, subject to consideration of drawback arising from the later re-export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>