<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 496 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107687</link>
    <description>A mere recovery communication proposing attachment for unpaid dues is not an adjudication order because it does not decide any lis or determine rights. Appeal lies only against an adjudicatory order, so a letter intimating that the department will proceed with recovery cannot be challenged as if it were a final decision. On that basis, the appeal against the communication was not maintainable, and its dismissal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:16:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 496 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107687</link>
      <description>A mere recovery communication proposing attachment for unpaid dues is not an adjudication order because it does not decide any lis or determine rights. Appeal lies only against an adjudicatory order, so a letter intimating that the department will proceed with recovery cannot be challenged as if it were a final decision. On that basis, the appeal against the communication was not maintainable, and its dismissal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>