<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 316 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107684</link>
    <description>A dispute on assessable value, once finally settled under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme for a particular period, cannot be reopened through a fresh show cause notice on the same valuation issue for the same goods and period by recasting the ground on a different factual basis. The earlier settlement gave the controversy finality, and fragmenting the dispute did not permit revival of the same assessment matter. The later notice was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 316 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107684</link>
      <description>A dispute on assessable value, once finally settled under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme for a particular period, cannot be reopened through a fresh show cause notice on the same valuation issue for the same goods and period by recasting the ground on a different factual basis. The earlier settlement gave the controversy finality, and fragmenting the dispute did not permit revival of the same assessment matter. The later notice was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>